True Derivation Based On True Assumption Which Verifies That Fundamental Assumption in Special Theory of Relativity Is Wrong or False

The content given on the link given just below verifies the fact that fundamental assumption in special theory of relativity that speed of light is same in all reference frames regardless of speed of observer and regardless of speed of source is wrong or false. It validates Galilean velocity addition formula for light derived earlier and also validates the fact that speed of light can be different in different reference frames.

True Derivation Based On True Assumption

Circumstantial Evidence Which Suggests Existence of Absolute Reference Frame And Reveals Falsity of Special Theory of Relativity

Moving charge produces current. Therefore if two electric charges separated by some distance and stationary with respect to each other are moving together in some direction, they will constitute currents in same or opposite directions and these currents will interact with each other using magnetic field and they will attract or repel each other using magnetic force. Now this magnetic force between two moving charges depends on the speed of the movement of charges because higher the speed of charges, higher the amount of current and therefore higher amount of magnetic interaction between charges. And higher amount of magnetic interaction leads to higher amount of magnetic force between charges. Hence if Einstein is right that nothing is absolute or absolute reference frame does not exist, we will be able to find two different speeds of the charges with respect to two different and distinct reference frames which will imply two different value of (amount of) magnetic force between the two moving charges at the same time. This is not possible because the force must have only one exact value at a time. It cannot have multiple values at the same time. Therefore Einstein cannot be right in this matter also. This fact that the magnetic force existing between two moving charges has only one value implies that the speed of the charges should have also only one value and that value should be the value of speed with respect to absolute reference frame and not any other speed measured with any other reference frame.

The moving charges described in above paragraph are stationary with respect to each other but both charges are moving with a certain speed with respect to absolute reference frame and hence this movement of charges with respect to absolute reference frame constitutes currents and results in magnetic interaction between them and they experience magnetic force. Since this magnetic force must have only one value, the speed must have only one value which is measured with respect to absolute reference frame only and the speed measured with other reference frame will be different but that speed cannot be used to calculate the magnetic force. Only the speed with respect to absolute reference frame can be used for that purpose. Hence the absolute reference frame is distinct in this way from all other reference frames.

Therefore from above discussion we can define absolute reference frame as a reference frame in which the electrical charges do not have magnetic interaction with each other and magnetic force between charges do not exist because the charges are stationary and not moving and hence they do not constitute any currents. In other words, an object residing in absolute reference frame has zero velocity/speed and zero acceleration as well as zero kinetic energy. 

Possible Explanation of Failure of Michelson-Morley Experiment to Detect Absolute Reference Frame

The content provided on the link given just below tries to explain failure of Michelson-Morley experiment to detect absolute reference frame. It also explains how Michelson-Morley experiment is not right tool for detecting absolute reference frame. It also tries to prove fundamental postulate of special theory of relativity wrong with the help of a logical argument.

Possible Explanation of Failure of Michelson-Morley Experiment to Detect Absolute Reference Frame

In the content given on the link just above, an assumption has been made that the speed in a particular equation is the speed with respect to source. The support, clarification, explanation and verification for this assumption are available now. To see it, click on the link given just below.

Support/Clarification/Explanation/Verification of the Assumption

For clarification regarding velocity addition, you can open the link given just below. The content given on the link given just below proves wrong the fundamental postulate of special theory of relativity and also proves that velocity addition is also wrong in special theory of relativity.

Clarification/Explanation Regarding Velocity Addition Involving Speed of Light Or Speed of Light Emitted by Source Moving With Respect to A Particular Given Reference Frame

For clarification or explanation of Doppler shift using the velocity addition formula described in the content given on the link just above and for possible support of the velocity addition formula (yet to be experimentally verified), you can open the link given just below.

Explanation and Clarification on Doppler Shift in Electromagnetic Waves

You will be able to view files more clearly if you download the files and open them using Adobe Reader.

For any further explanation or clarification for the content given in this blog, you can contact me on lalitvadher@gmail.com using E-mail.

Thank You. Wish you have got the truth!

Consequences of Special Theory of Relativity Being Proven Wrong

Possible consequences of special theory of relativity being proven wrong can be:

1. Mass-energy equivalence is lost.
2. Some part of theoretical physics (modern physics, nuclear physics etc.) may need to be repaired and constructed again.

One possible method to construct and repair it again is to propose hypothesis in such a way that it explains the physics behind the phenomena occurring in the physical world. One such new hypothesis proposes to treat mass and energy as two different physical quantities. Mass resists change while energy induces change (except when it is binding energy), although mass can store energy.

Another new hypothesis is the hypothesis of antigravity which proposes that energy repels energy. You can read more about the hypothesis of antigravity on the link provided just below:

Hypothesis of Antigravity and Concept of Absolute Reference Frame

The content provided on the link given just above also tries to explain certain physical phenomena occurring in the physical world and tries to construct and repair some part of theoretical physics, modern physics etc. The content given on above link also introduces the concept of existence of absolute reference frame which can help in explaining occurrence of many physical phenomena.

Special theory of relativity denied existence of absolute reference frame. Concept of nonexistence of absolute reference frame was a base from which special theory of relativity was constructed. But, the content provided on the link above shows that absolute reference frame can exist but finding the absolute reference frame is difficult. We cannot prove that absolute reference frame does not exist just because we experience difficulty in finding absolute reference frame. Hence the content predicts existence of absolute reference frame and indirectly exposes the wrongness and inappropriateness of special theory of relativity and reveals the lack of proper base in special theory of relativity. If you want to prove special theory of relativity right, you must prove first that absolute reference frame does not exist. If you find the existence of absolute reference frame or a physical phenomenon which indirectly suggests the existence of absolute reference frame, special theory of relativity is proved wrong. Therefore, the content given on the link above indirectly tries to prove special theory of relativity wrong and support/verify the fact that there exists wrongness in special theory of relativity. For direct proof that there exists wrongness in special theory of relativity, you can visit the post that was posted earlier before this post in this blog. You will find that post at the bottom of this page (blog).

For more explanations or clarifications on some concepts such as time and Maxwell's equations, you can open the following links:

Time Part 1

Time Part 2

Mathematical Verification of Maxwell's First Equation

Mathematical Verification of Maxwell's Second Equation

Physical Interpretation of Maxwell's Equations

Invalidity of conventional physics to explain atomic model

I hope that above links will be useful in constructing new physics and repairing old physics.

You can provide suggestions and feedback to lalitvadher@gmail.com using E-mail.

Your suggestions and feedback will be used to improve the quality of the material and construction of new physics.

You will be able to view the files more clearly if you download the files and open them using Adobe Reader.

Thank You

Direct Proof that Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity is Wrong

Einstein's special theory of relativity can be proven wrong by doing thought experiments which are more general than the thought experiments done by Einstein. Interpretation of time dilation and energy mass equivalence equation (energy=mass*square of the speed of light) which were based on special theory of relativity can be proven wrong. It can also be shown that Lorentz transformations are wrong and wrongly derived/assumed. To know how, the link is provided below. Here note that the assumption in special theory of relativity that speed of light is same in all reference frames regardless of their speeds is a wrong assumption. The proof which proves that this is a wrong assumption is given above in the link named 'Possible Explanation of Failure of Michelson-Morley Experiment to Detect Absolute Reference Frame'. Further derivation done in special theory of relativity using the wrong assumption is also wrong. Even if we accept the wrong assumption that the speed of light is same in all reference frames regardless of their speeds as true assumption (which should not be done because actually the speed of light can be different in different reference frames), the further derivation based on it in special theory of relativity is also wrong and full of errors. In short, even if we accept the wrong assumption (which should not be done), there are errors in further analysis and derivation of special theory of relativity. Also note that we have assumed the wrong assumption in the content given on the link given just below only to show that further analysis and derivation based on it (the wrong assumption) in special theory of relativity is also wrong and full of errors. It just shows that the way in which interpretation of time dilation, derivation of energy mass equivalence and derivation of Lorentz transformation were carried out in special theory of relativity is simply wrong and inappropriate.

Proof that interpretation of time dilation is wrong in special theory of relativity and mass energy equivalence based on special theory of relativity is also wrong or proof that some/whole part of special theory of relativity is wrong

Note that the content given on the link just above only proves that the method of derivation was wrong in special theory of relativity. Therefore the content given on the link just above should be used only for the purpose of showing the method of derivation in special theory of relativity wrong. Because the content given on the link just above contains wrong assumption made in special theory of relativity. It only shows that further derivation done using the wrong assumption in special theory of relativity contains errors and mistakes apart from the mistake of assuming the wrong assumption.

To see the proof that energy mass equivalence equation (E=mc²) is not valid as a general equation, you can open the link given just below. The proof is based on simple calculus.

Proof that energy mass equivalence equation (E=mc²) is not valid as a general equation (based on simple calculus) NOTE: PROOF GIVEN ON THIS LINK SHOULD BE EXAMINED CRITICALLY BY EXPERTS BEFORE ACCEPTING IT

Here it should be noted that the proof given on the link shown just above of this paragraph needs to be evaluated and examined critically and it should be accepted only after critical evaluation or examination by experts.

Finally you can open the link given just below which contains final rebuttal of energy mass equivalence.

Rough Arguments against Energy Mass Equivalence

You will be able to view the files more clearly if you download the files and open them using Adobe Reader.

You can provide suggestions and feedback to lalitvadher@gmail.com using E-mail. I have tried my best to keep the content provided on this blog error free. But still if you find any type of errors in this blog, you are requested to report it to me on the E-mail address mentioned above in this paragraph so that I can correct the errors and the future readers of this blog can enjoy the error free content and also they can easily and quickly understand the content saving their time and effort. 

You can also contact me for more explanation if you require.

Thank You